Re: “The valedictorian’s speech” and “Vic Toews does not deserve to be honou

In response to The valedictorian’s speech, published October, 21, 2010.

As both an alumnus and as a current student of the University of Winnipeg, I would like to voice my full support for the statements made by Erin Larson. I also strongly disapprove of the decision to bestow Vic Toews with an honorary degree. Erin Larson did not speak for everyone; however her actions did bring attention to and voice the concerns of many students and faculty.

The purpose of the valedictory address is to make a closing farewell statement that is motivational and is meant to inspire the graduates and those who have supported them. The message that I received from her valediction is that even after graduation we must continue to think critically.

We pursue a liberal arts education to become critical thinkers, not to receive a piece of paper that will catapult us to a higher wage bracket. I was once told that protesting and critical thinking is largely limited to the university campus. After graduation most students stop thinking critically.

Readers, faculty, and graduating students should all learn from the actions of Erin Larson and to be inspired to think critically and to be vocal in support of your principles.

Sean Little

– Sean Little

Published in Volume 65, Number 9 of The Uniter (October 28, 2010)